Un sistema personal de gestión del conocimiento

// ❌ The collector's trap — save everything, process nothing
interface RawNote {
  source: string;
  content: string; // Full copy of the article
  savedAt: Date;
  tags: string[];
  // Never looked at again after saving
}

// ✅ Progressive processing pipeline
interface CapturedNote {
  id: string;
  source: string;
  capturedAt: Date;
  status: "inbox" | "processing" | "permanent";
  rawHighlights: string[];
}
 
interface ProcessedNote {
  id: string;
  title: string; // Your own words, not the source title
  insight: string; // One core idea in 2-3 sentences
  evidence: string; // Supporting example or code snippet
  connections: string[]; // IDs of related notes
  applicationContext: string; // When would I use this?
  source: string;
  processedAt: Date;
}
 
// The processing step is where learning happens
function processCapture(
  raw: CapturedNote,
  existingNotes: ProcessedNote[]
): ProcessedNote {
  return {
    id: generateId(),
    // Rewrite in your own words — forces understanding
    title: "Index-only scans eliminate heap fetches",
    // Distill to the core insight
    insight:
      "A covering index includes all columns needed by a " +
      "query, allowing Postgres to satisfy the query entirely " +
      "from the index without reading the heap table. This " +
      "eliminates random I/O on large tables.",
    // Concrete evidence or example
    evidence: `
      CREATE INDEX idx_orders_covering
      ON orders (customer_id)
      INCLUDE (total, status, created_at);
      -- Query reads only from index, not table
    `,
    // Link to existing knowledge
    connections: findRelatedNotes(existingNotes, [
      "database-indexing",
      "query-optimization",
      "io-patterns",
    ]).map((n) => n.id),
    // When does this matter?
    applicationContext:
      "When queries on large tables have high heap fetch " +
      "counts in EXPLAIN ANALYZE, check if a covering " +
      "index can serve the query from index alone.",
    source: raw.source,
    processedAt: new Date(),
  };
}

// Atomic note structure — one idea per note
interface Zettel {
  id: string;
  title: string;
  content: string;
  links: Array<{
    targetId: string;
    relationship: string; // Why these are connected
  }>;
  sequences: string[]; // Ordered note chains for topics
  tags: string[]; // Entry points, not categories
}
 
// Example note network for "database performance"
const notes: Zettel[] = [
  {
    id: "2023-12-a1",
    title: "Index-only scans eliminate heap table reads",
    content:
      "Covering indexes include all columns a query needs...",
    links: [
      {
        targetId: "2023-09-b3",
        relationship:
          "Covering indexes are a specific technique for " +
          "reducing the I/O patterns described in this note",
      },
      {
        targetId: "2023-11-c2",
        relationship:
          "EXPLAIN ANALYZE output shows whether index-only " +
          "scan is used, connecting to query analysis methods",
      },
    ],
    sequences: ["database-performance"],
    tags: ["postgresql", "indexing", "performance"],
  },
  {
    id: "2023-09-b3",
    title: "Random I/O vs sequential I/O cost difference",
    content:
      "Random reads are 10-100x slower than sequential...",
    links: [
      {
        targetId: "2023-12-a1",
        relationship: "Index-only scans avoid random I/O",
      },
      {
        targetId: "2023-08-d1",
        relationship: "SSD vs HDD changes the cost ratio",
      },
    ],
    sequences: ["database-performance", "systems-fundamentals"],
    tags: ["io", "performance", "hardware"],
  },
];
 
// Find notes by traversing connections
function getRelatedInsights(
  startId: string,
  notes: Zettel[],
  depth: number = 2
): Zettel[] {
  const visited = new Set<string>();
  const result: Zettel[] = [];
 
  function traverse(id: string, currentDepth: number) {
    if (currentDepth > depth || visited.has(id)) return;
    visited.add(id);
 
    const note = notes.find((n) => n.id === id);
    if (!note) return;
 
    result.push(note);
    for (const link of note.links) {
      traverse(link.targetId, currentDepth + 1);
    }
  }
 
  traverse(startId, 0);
  return result;
}

// Spaced repetition scheduler for technical concepts
interface FlashCard {
  id: string;
  front: string; // Question or prompt
  back: string; // Answer or explanation
  interval: number; // Days until next review
  easeFactor: number; // How easy this card is (2.5 default)
  nextReview: Date;
  noteId: string; // Link back to knowledge base
}
 
function scheduleReview(
  card: FlashCard,
  quality: 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
): FlashCard {
  // SM-2 algorithm (simplified)
  let { interval, easeFactor } = card;
 
  if (quality < 3) {
    // Failed — reset interval
    interval = 1;
  } else {
    if (interval === 0) interval = 1;
    else if (interval === 1) interval = 6;
    else interval = Math.round(interval * easeFactor);
  }
 
  // Adjust ease factor
  easeFactor = Math.max(
    1.3,
    easeFactor + (0.1 - (5 - quality) * (0.08 + (5 - quality) * 0.02))
  );
 
  const nextReview = new Date();
  nextReview.setDate(nextReview.getDate() + interval);
 
  return { ...card, interval, easeFactor, nextReview };
}
 
// Convert processed notes to flashcards
function noteToCards(note: ProcessedNote): FlashCard[] {
  return [
    {
      id: `${note.id}-concept`,
      front: `What is the core insight about: ${note.title}?`,
      back: note.insight,
      interval: 0,
      easeFactor: 2.5,
      nextReview: new Date(),
      noteId: note.id,
    },
    {
      id: `${note.id}-application`,
      front: `When would you apply: ${note.title}?`,
      back: note.applicationContext,
      interval: 0,
      easeFactor: 2.5,
      nextReview: new Date(),
      noteId: note.id,
    },
  ];
}

## Weekly PKM Review Checklist (30 minutes)
 
### Inbox Processing (15 min)
- [ ] Review all items in inbox (articles, highlights, notes)
- [ ] For each item: process into a permanent note OR delete
- [ ] Empty the inbox completely — no "I'll process this later"
 
### Connection Building (10 min)
- [ ] For each new permanent note, find 2-3 connections
- [ ] Write the relationship description (why connected)
- [ ] Check if any existing notes should link to the new ones
 
### Spaced Repetition (5 min)
- [ ] Review today's due flashcards
- [ ] Create cards for any new notes that have
      application-worthy insights
 
### Monthly: Note Quality Audit
- [ ] Pick 10 random notes — are they still useful?
- [ ] Merge notes that overlap significantly
- [ ] Archive notes that are outdated or wrong
- [ ] Update connections that no longer make sense

// Automate the weekly review reminders
interface ReviewMetrics {
  inboxCount: number;
  dueFlashcards: number;
  orphanNotes: number; // Notes with no connections
  staleNotes: number; // Notes not touched in 6 months
}
 
function generateReviewSummary(
  notes: ProcessedNote[],
  cards: FlashCard[]
): ReviewMetrics {
  const now = new Date();
  const sixMonthsAgo = new Date(
    now.getTime() - 180 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000
  );
 
  return {
    inboxCount: notes.filter(
      (n) => n.source && !n.connections.length
    ).length,
    dueFlashcards: cards.filter(
      (c) => c.nextReview <= now
    ).length,
    orphanNotes: notes.filter(
      (n) => n.connections.length === 0
    ).length,
    staleNotes: notes.filter(
      (n) => n.processedAt < sixMonthsAgo
    ).length,
  };
}